“American Sniper” and Moral Injury

AMERICAN SNIPER

By Kathy Winings

kathy-winings-2Clint Eastwood’s powerful film, “American Sniper,” dares to bring to public consciousness the hidden side of war. This hidden side is the tremendous toll war takes on the moral and psychological dimension — the soul — of the men and women who serve on the front lines. The film is based on Navy Seal Chris Kyle’s autobiography by the same title and follows his experiences as one of the most lethal snipers in U.S. military history with 160 confirmed kills.

Posted in Iraq, Kyle, brilliantly played in the film by Bradley Cooper, served four tours of duty before being honorably discharged in 2009. On coming home, like many returning veterans, Kyle had the difficult task of adjusting to civilian life in Texas as a husband and father to his two children. In 2013, he and fellow veteran, Chad Littlefield, were shot and killed by another veteran, Eddie Ray Routh, while at a practice range. Routh, who had been recently discharged from a mental health facility and been diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), had arranged to meet with Kyle, who was trying to help him with his depression. The poignancy of the film was heightened when Routh’s trial began as “American Sniper” was being shown across the country. Routh was convicted of the murders two days after the February 22nd Oscars telecast, and immediately sentenced to life in prison without parole.

The film brilliantly and poignantly presents the personal turmoil that a soldier faces when holding a life in the crosshairs of his or her rifle. One particularly heart-wrenching scene shows a moment of decision when Kyle has a small Iraqi boy and a woman, who we assume is his mother, in his gun sights. The young boy is given an anti-tank grenade by the hijab-clad woman and begins to walk toward the column of approaching American soldiers. Kyle is praying for the child to stop or at least indicate he means no harm. But the boy doesn’t, and Kyle must do what he is trained to do  —  shoot him. When the mother then rushes to her child, picks up the grenade and runs toward the soldiers, Kyle must shoot her as well.

We see the anguish that plagues Kyle with each kill. We also see his inability to leave the war behind in Iraq each time he returns home between tours of duty. We then find ourselves asking the question: “Why did he sign up for additional tours of duty when each tour and each time he pulled the trigger seemed to eat away at his soul?” The film leads us to gain an inner glimpse into what really draws young men and women to fight in a very different type of war with a very different type of “enemy.” This is the need to serve and protect. This is especially true for those in special forces such as the Navy Seals. The patriotic mindset together with the sense of belonging and having a shared experience bonded the young men and women and aided them in being hyper-vigilant with each sortie.

While the film is powerful and Bradley Cooper gives a convincing and Oscar-worthy performance, the value of the film is it pushes us to question what really happens to the thousands of men and women who experience war. As we follow Chris Kyle, we realize what he is experiencing is not easily explained as PTSD. During one of his visits home, he is waiting for the mechanic to finish working on his car. It is a simple straightforward scene. However, during the scene, another customer comes up to him eager to shake the hand of a legend. Kyle, though, feels self-conscious and embarrassed by it and clearly wants to leave quickly. In addition, he goes into a protective stance when he hears a car backfire. Are these reactions a symptom of PTSD? Or is something else going on — that being the concept of moral injury?

Moral injury is an attempt to explain what returning veterans are experiencing. Brett Litz, a Boston University clinical psychologist specializing in veterans, defines moral injury as “acts that transgress deeply held moral beliefs and expectations.” The fundamental distinction between moral injury and PTSD is in the core emotion experienced by the individual.

In PTSD the overwhelming experience is of fear, whereas moral injury is rooted in shame and guilt. This is why returning veterans feel that their souls are in anguish because of what they did. As Ed Tick, founder of Soldier’s Heart, an agency that provides counseling support for veterans, describes it, what soldiers experience is a wound to their soul. Why did Kyle have problems in adjusting to being back home between tours of duty? His soul was in anguish because in the process of killing the enemy, his conscience or his soul, was struggling with his repeated action of consciously killing another human being — enemy or not.

As a human being raised within the Christian tradition, he had been taught throughout his young life, “Thou shalt not kill” — especially pertinent in Kyle’s case, who had each individual he shot squarely in his gun’s crosshairs. Is it any question, then, that he struggled when he was away from Iraq and back in the safety of home? As an individual with good character, he was feeling either guilt, shame or remorse for having caused another person’s death. This is moral pain. So he becomes uncomfortable when that young man approaches him and thanks him for saving American lives because his soul is struggling with this reality. This would also explain why Routh was unable to deal with his depression.

The official trailer for “American Sniper” (courtesy Warner Brothers Pictures).

The concept of moral injury and soul wound is relatively new. PTSD has been the diagnosis of choice by the medical profession. However, it is this same medical profession that has raised the question of the effectiveness of the PTSD label now that it is increasingly clear that the medications and therapies designed to address PTSD are not completely effective. Nor does it provide guidance for the veteran’s family and community as to how to support their loved one who is experiencing this anguish. When we look at the struggles on the part of Kyle’s wife, Taya (played by Sienna Miller), to support her husband when she sees him in obvious anguish, the PTSD diagnosis cannot help her in that moment. After all, while the solider may be the one who actually experienced war and combat, their families and communities are the reason these soldiers were willing to do this, and when they come home, they are returning to these same families and communities.

As I watched “American Sniper,” hard as it was to do so — and not just because of the violence — I could not help but reflect on the part that we all have played directly or indirectly in the wars in the Middle East. More importantly, as a religious educator, it struck me that we need to generate and foster more theological reflection and examination within the wider community on the larger fundamental issues of war. We would do well to ask such questions as: “Can war ever really be ‘just’”? “Why must we, men and women created in the image of God, rely on war for our sense of security?” “How do we make sense of the atrocities committed by our soldiers and  atrocities committed by ‘the enemy’?” Such collective reflections and conversations will also go a long way in supporting the healing process of our returning veterans — men and women like Chris Kyle and many others whose stories we do not yet know.

I hope that “American Sniper” is not relegated to the long list of outstanding Oscar Best Picture nominees (though it surpassed “Saving Private Ryan” as the most successful war movie ever). I encourage people to see the film, but not just to admire the amazing performance given by Bradley Cooper or astounding directing of Clint Eastwood. I recommend it as the beginning of a public conversation that needs to take place. Such conversations are the start of unlearning violence and learning peacemaking as we move toward the Kingdom of God on earth.♦

“American Sniper,” rated R, is currently in theaters. Directed by Clint Eastwood; produced by Clint Eastwood, Robert Lorenz, Andrew Lazar, Peter Morgan, and Bradley Cooper; released by Warner Brothers Pictures. Running time: 134 minutes. Cast: Bradley Cooper (Chris Kyle), Sienna Miller (Taya Kyle), Luke Grimes (Marc Lee), Jake McDorman (Biggles), Kevin Lacz (Dauber), Cory Hardrict (Dandridge), Navid Negahban (Sheikh Al-Obodi), and Keir O’Donnell (Jeff Kyle). “American Sniper” received six Academy Award nominations, including Best Picture, Best Adapted Screenplay and Best Actor for Bradley Cooper, ultimately winning the award for Best Sound Editing.

Dr. Kathy Winings is Vice President for Academic Affairs, Director, Doctor of Ministry Program, and Professor of Religious Education and Ministry at UTS. She is also the Vice President of the Board of Directors for the International Relief Friendship Foundation.

Photo at top: Bradley Cooper as Chris Kyle in “American Sniper” (courtesy Warner Bothers Pictures)

7 thoughts on ““American Sniper” and Moral Injury

  1. Thank you. This is an important conversation.

    See this entry on “just war”: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_war_theory

    You ask if there could ever be a just war. I for one think that for the moment the answer is yes. That is not to assign goodness to the act, merely to say it is less evil than the alternatives. Until we can create an acceptable method of communication with those who we disagree with violently, we will have to justify our actions. Truly, war is hell; and hell doesn’t go away just because we assert it is not where we want to be as human beings.

    Your essay reminds us of the actual cost we incur when we commit to such military battles.

  2. I found this article very interesting. I remember reading that Reverend Moon was happy and liberated that he didn’t ever have to kill another human being in war. Particularly as a religious person, it is a big moral dilemma to have to kill for whatever reason. Of course, Rev. Moon also said he was willing to fight and die in certain situations, but I feel that God did not want him to be caught in that situation as his holy son and True Parent. Definitely we have to find better ways as human beings than to have to send young people to war. In the future, patriotism will be demonstrated in active peacemaking or belonging to a peace academy or peace corps that keeps peace in the world.

  3. Thanks for the article and the comments. I chose not to see the movie, as I prefer to see family movies these days. Wars may be necessary, but perhaps hardly ever really just. If Western powers would have invested more in serving the nations in the Middle East from the 1950s on, instead of just treating them as places for tourism and/or attractive lucrative business contracts, perhaps things would be different now. It seems evil forces in the ME are now being used to counter evil moral developments in the Western culture, and it is indeed a question whether young men and women of Blessed Families would have to engage in such conflicts (although still admirable if they do), as there are other causes to fight for now, that aim to prevent these kind of wars.

  4. This film should raise questions on what Unificationism has to offer in the area of foreign policy guidelines. It is not an easy topic for us because for a peace movement, we have a lot of tolerance for war. Father praised the US involvement in the Korean War as a very good condition. Father manufactured military weapons through Tongil Industries and encouraged the US government to adopt an aggressive response to Soviet expansionism. We learn in Divine Principle that the world wars were providential.

    It would be hard to make the case that Iraq is better off today than it would have been had the US left the country to its own devices, particularly for those former residents of traditional Christian communities that have recently been destroyed.

    It is worth noting that the hero of the movie appears to have had a rather dubious character. Chris Kyle does not appear to have been a straight shooter in real life. His estate was forced to pay $1.8 million in a defamation lawsuit. He also made some other rather unbelievable claims.

    Perhaps we should find common cause with the founding ideals of America rather than with a foreign policy of deciding what goes on in other countries. Personal responsibility, religious, economic and political freedom, and respect for the consent of the governed can be augmented by our ethics of true love family and lineage. We should promote Father’s ideal of living by conscience, the opposite of coercion. This would be a better way to leave a legacy of genuine religious impact.

    “The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible.” – George Washington’s Farewell Address, 1796

  5. Thanks, Kathy, for a fine essay/review. I always enjoy your posts. However, for those of us yet to see the movie, maybe a “spoiler alert” would helpful (e.g., “He shoots the kid. And his mother!”). I can imagine that such moments are filled with dramatic tension. But not so much after reading a spoiler 😦

  6. I was not going to watch this movie as I do not enjoy war scenes or violence of any type. However, a friend asked me to come with her to watch the movie.

    Speaking of spoiler, I admit it helped me get over the hurdle of seeing a boy and his mother killed. I was prepared for it, yet, I understood the pain and turmoil of the sniper that has to shoot as the lesser of two evils; two people dead versus a whole platoon. This is the raw reality of war.

    What moved me in the movie is to observe the unfolding of the hero’s journey. When the scene of the attack of the American embassy was shown on TV and later on, the horrors of 9/11, one could see, in Bradley Cooper’s eyes a calling. He felt it in his soul. His life would never be the same. He has embarked on, what Joseph Campbell calls, the hero’s journey which has three parts: separation, initiation and the return.

    This hero’s return was two-fold: the return to his community and then, unfortunately, his untimely return to the spirit world.

    When I saw that look in his eyes, his resolve forming and building, I could not help but remember how all of us felt the call, in our young years. A call of a different kind, followed by a course that presented challenges of all kinds.

    The return is also about “coming home from the intense activities” and making a difference in our communities with the gifts we have developed.

    I was moved by the hero’s continuous desire to serve his fellow men who have suffered in the war. His heart was so deep and so caring. Taking care of others eases the pain of our own hearts and lifts up our spirit. This movie was a good reminder of this truth.

    Unfortunately, Chris Kyle’s life was cut short. Thousands of people lined up for his funeral. Their hearts were moved. In the theater, in Mobile, AL, when the movie ended and the photos were shown at the end, the audience was riveted to their seats. There was silence and awe, respect and admiration. I have never witnessed such a reaction before. Hearts were touched. That is for certain.

Please leave a comment or reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s