Saints Behaving Badly: Nothing New


by Jim Dougherty

Jim DoughertyIn the midst of struggles, early Puritan minister, Massachusetts Bay Colony political figure and Harvard president Increase Mather famously paraphrased I Cor. 10-13 as “Nothing has befallen you, but what is common to men, yea, and to the best of men.”

As Unificationists face the somewhat ironic spectacle of a movement dedicated to unity struggling to unify, amidst faction, division and strife, it’s important to remember we are not the first to stride, stumble, trip, and crawl down this path, and ask ourselves: “What has befallen us, that is not common to people?” — Nothing.

Most, if not all, of the problems we face are the same as others have faced before us. Those problems should not be dismissed or treated lightly, even if we’ve seen them many times before. Indeed, they should be taken all the more seriously as they have proven to be difficult, in many cases almost impossible, to solve. But neither should we be dismayed by those problems, or draw the false conclusion of discouragement because we still face them. Looking at history and what others have gone through can give us perspective, help us manage our expectations, and encourage us to work steadily on the problems we face with the many solutions at our disposal.

Great examples of historical church figures not always living up to our high expectations are found in Saints Behaving Badly: The Cutthroats, Crooks, Trollops, Con Men, and Devil-Worshippers Who Became Saints (2006) by Thomas J. Craughwell, a respected Catholic newspaper columnist.

Pope Callixtus I, for example, martyred in 223 CE and canonized, was originally a Christian slave of another Christian, Carpophorus, who had Callixtus set up a bank of sorts for fellow Christians, to protect and invest the savings of widows and orphans, and to collect donations for them. Carpophorus had come to believe that Callixtus was a man of some financial acumen who could handle the job, but it turned out that trust was misplaced. Callixtus succeeded in losing all the money invested, and embezzled some of it in the process. With Roman Christians stripped of their savings and enraged, Callixtus fled to the nearest harbor and booked passage on the first ship he could find.

Carpophorus was not about to let Callixtus slip away, however, tracking him down to the port and engaging a boat to take him out to Callixtus’s fleeing ship. When Callixtus saw Carpophorus approaching, he jumped into the water and tried to swim away, but sailors set out after him and handed him over.

As a slave, under Roman law Callixtus’s fate was entirely up to his master, and Carpophorus set him to hard labor, chained to gristmill, where he could expect to spend the rest of his miserable, exhausting and likely short life.

And that might very well have been his ultimate fate had not the depositors of Carpophorus’s failed bank themselves appealed to him to release Callixtus, in the hope that he might be able to recover at least some of the lost funds. Apparently these people knew Callixtus was a scoundrel but hoped in the time-honored tradition of financial victims everywhere that he might at least be a competent scoundrel, who could possibly get some of their money back if properly motivated.

And motivated he was. His first collection stop was Rome’s synagogue — on Saturday morning — where he crashed the Sabbath service and demanded money from the congregation. The ensuing scene one can well imagine ended badly, with Callixtus being escorted against his will by congregation members to court. Callixtus was charged with disturbing the peace and desecrating a holy place, and with being a member of an outlawed sect, Christianity. Carpophorus even showed up and perjured himself by swearing falsely that Callixtus was not a Christian, but that was not enough to save him from scourging and being sent to the salt mines in Sardinia.

Movie buffs might best visualize that fate by recalling Anthony Quinn’s suffering there in Barabbas (1961). It was a virtual death sentence from which no one was expected to return.

But once again Callixtus was saved from a fate he richly deserved. The emperor Commodus’s wife, Marcia, was a Christian, and she had heard of and sought to relieve the suffering of Christians in the Sardinian mines. She asked Pope Victor I for the names of believers sentenced there, to seek their release. Pope Victor provided a list with every name except one: Callixtus.

Never one to miss an opportunity, when the local governor assented to Marcia’s request and the prisoners were set to be released, Callixtus fell to his knees, weeping, and begged to not be left behind.

Evidently his powers of persuasion had not deserted him entirely, and Callixtus returned to Rome, where an outraged Carpophorus and Pope Victor scrambled to place Callixtus outside the city with an allowance and the hope that he would stay away and out of trouble.

This, for once in his life, he did, eventually finding a position as an assistant to an important priest, Zephyrinus. And when Victor died in 199 and Zephyrinus became pope, Callixtus was ordained a deacon and given more responsibility. When Pope Zephyrinus died in 217, Callixtus had so redeemed his reputation, he was elected pope himself, having traveled a long career path from slave, embezzler, troublemaker, outcast and condemned man — all of it, at least in name, as a Christian.

In addition to being the poster child for “Saints Behaving Badly” on an individual level, reminiscent of all the horror stories we’ve ever heard of misspent money, corruption and abuse of trust, Callixtus’s five-year reign as pope, with his understandable latter-day emphasis on mercy and forgiveness, spawned another all-too-familiar demon of the modern church: faction.


Detail of portrait of Increase Mather in 1688 by Joan van der Spriett.

His main critic was a rigid theologian and priest named Hippolytus, who believed that any mortal sinner should be expelled from the church permanently, regardless of repentance. Hippolytus also accused Callixtus of heresy and of being wicked and deceitful, and eventually had his followers elect him, Hippolytus, pope and thereby became the first antipope. Even when Callixtus was martyred by an anti-Christian mob in 222, Hippolytus continued to insist that he was the true pope, denying the validity of the elections of Urban I in 222 and Pontian in 230.

Reconciliation of a sort was found in tragedy when Emperor Maximinus targeted the clergy in a purge of Christians in 235, landing both Pontian and Hippolytus in — of all places — the mines of Sardinia. There, Hippolytus repented and asked to be reconciled to the church, but both he and Pontian died in the mines, and along with Callixtus were later honored as saints and martyrs.

Hippolytus was the first, but by far not the last of the antipopes. There were 22 antipopes from 1058 to 1449. During the worst of that period, the Great Schism, there were two popes from 1378 to 1406, and three from 1406 to 1417.  And these were not just eccentric kooks off in the wilderness preaching their own heresies, but ambitious, power-hungry men who threw the entire Christian world into chaos by their claims on the loyalties of laity and clergy alike. The administrative confusion alone must have made the church look pathetic, with rival colleges of cardinals, and two or three new leaders — each appointed by a different pope — showing up when there was a vacancy at an abbey or cathedral.

But the worst were the spiritual issues. For devout believers, “What would happen to Catholics who gave their allegiance to the wrong pope?” Craughwell asks. “It was a question that tormented consciences in every corner of Christendom.”

*     *     *

The recent controversy over the future of Barrytown College, on top of the already daunting financial, academic, administrative, and demographic challenges, created for all involved a difficult atmosphere. But it helps to stop and consider in context just how tough the underlying challenge we’re trying to address is.

A Bloomberg Business article from April 2014 summarizes the problem in an unsparing headline: “Small U.S. Colleges Battle Death Spiral as Enrollment Drops.” Like most business stories, it’s all about the numbers, and they are not encouraging:

  • Moody’s downgraded 28 colleges per year in 2008-13, more than double the average of 12 in the previous five years.
  • The number of private four-year colleges that were closed or merged doubled from around five per year before 2008 to ten annually through 2011.
  • A Harvard Business School expert predicts that as many as half of the more than 4,000 two- and four-year colleges in the U.S. may fail in the next 15 years.

And the response to the challenges those numbers represent sounds eerily familiar: small schools restructuring boards, changing leadership, cutting costs, and trying to revive stagnant fundraising campaigns.

Of course, the worst aspect is the impact upon the students themselves. Bloomberg quotes one student at a college on Long Island, who says, “There’s a lot of fear. It’s not the same college I arrived at…. This has been very depressing,” while reporting on idled shuttle buses, shuttered dormitories, classrooms, and bookstores.

It is, indeed, very depressing. But as the article itself demonstrates, not at all uncommon.

Like many of the challenges we face, “Nothing… but what is common to man.” Let us aspire to be those “best of men,” and women, to face the challenges in front of us without illusion, but also without the non-faith of discouragement that a people so blessed with solutions should be ashamed to admit to.♦

James H. Dougherty is owner of Editorial & Advertising Content Services. He is a retired editor of the Register-Star newspaper in Hudson, NY, and recipient of the 2001-2002 New York Newspaper Publishers Association Award of Excellence for Distinguished Editorial Writing. Jim is also a former CARP leader.

Photo at top: Statue of Pope Callixtus I, Cathedral of Reims, France.

7 thoughts on “Saints Behaving Badly: Nothing New

Add yours

  1. Some haven’t recognized that we’ve moved into a post-Messianic age, where the providence is focused on settlement and community, not on restoration. Who better than Mother to lead in such an age? The great single leader era is over with Foundation Day, and the leaders of the providence at this point are those who are not typically thinking of themselves as leaders, but who are nevertheless carrying us into a new age of peace and love; in fact, it is the members themselves, as far as the UC is concerned. I hope they can accept the female style of leadership soon, because that is what will make them happy too, and actually attract people to the UC finally.

  2. Jim, Thank you for the informative and insightful article. Glad to see that you have been successful in your calling as a writer and editor.

  3. It is very interesting to read this historical perspective and notice that human nature has not changed that much. We struggle, indeed, with similar issues. That realization may drive us to be more humble and less judgmental toward those who walked the path before us. The Facebook relationship status “It’s complicated” comes to mind.

    “What would happen to Catholics who gave their allegiance to the wrong pope?” is certainly a question that may have deeply tormented believers as the fear of judgment is so strong.

    I hope, in our time, we can go beyond what Catholics faced in those days by realizing that, in the Age of Direct Dominion that was announced in the year 2000, what really matters is that we take personal responsibility, find God in our own hearts and learn to follow our conscience. “Conscience before teacher, conscience before parents, conscience before God.”

    The question is: “Are we (collectively and individually) mature enough to do that?” If we can work on that, we would be able to transcend the drama and trauma brought on by divisions and replace torment by love and peace.

    Isn’t that what we deeply long for?

  4. Jim, Thanks so much for this. The message seems to be to avoid judging, as John the Baptist did, and strive to see from God’s viewpoint. Father himself gave “rascals” many opportunities to change, striving for “natural subjugation.” Our position always needs to be to support God’s providential direction, the way of the True Parents, Heavenly Parent’s vertical line.

  5. “What has been will be again,
    what has been done will be done again;
    there is nothing new under the sun.” Ecclesiastes 1:9 (NIV)

    Not sure who the “saints” are here (certainly, not me), but sacrifice and even “living for the sake of others,” somehow do not quite fit, what I see anyway, as the Unification brand.

    Looking at history, particularly that of religion (not simply Christianity), affords us some measure of perspective. Yes, thank you.

    IMO, the great example – and legacy – of our paternal Teacher/Messiah/Founder/Friend is and will ever be one of resilience.

    We endure.

    What gift(s) have we and shall we leave to the generations to come?

  6. Yet I think even the multiple examples of mischievous popes which come down to us in history don’t seem to give us much guidance as to decisions that we must make.

    The problem is that we members have looked to the center for guidance in day-to-day issues of our life of faith. While the time had come for us to act more independently, for many of us our lives were built around decisions coming from the center.

    I think the first time I saw Father he asked us what we would do if he came to Belvedere drunk and peed on the floor. But the question becomes more challenging if we were asked to follow someone other than True Parents who peed on the floor. And we are asked just that.

  7. Thank you for this article. It was a really deep and informative. I feel like as a movement we would benefit from learning a few lessons from this article. We should learn from the past. Analysing it and finding the similarities aren’t enough to justify the actions that our members are taking. I feel like we should stand by our message of unity and start by uniting ourselves. Taking the time to ensure we don’t repeat the past is the only way to stand out and make a difference. I feel that if we do the same thing as our brothers and sisters did all that while back, then what difference shall we have made in the course of history? If we cannot unite under one leader, how do we convince the world to unite under one God? I really appreciate this article, Mr. Dougherty, you really got me thinking hard. Which I guess is the whole point of this site, right? Make us question our thoughts and get together to share them. Again, I loved the article!

Use the box below to submit a new comment (To reply, click "Reply" within a specific comment above)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Website Built with

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: