The old adage that polite conversation should avoid politics and religion to maintain friendly relationships has never proven to be truer than during this election season. Rather than civil discourse about the issues of the day and better approaches to addressing them, the election has become a mudslinging contest over which candidate has the most baggage and would be most disastrous in office.
Worse yet, anybody who speaks on behalf of, or against, one of the candidates is branded a bigot, a misogynist, a hog at the public trough, un-American, a fool, atheistic, even satanic by guilt through association. Friends and relatives easily get caught up in the fray and even religious communities, Unificationism included, have become deeply divided.
As tempting as it is to base a decision on who has the better character in this election, no candidate rises to the level of a Washington, Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt or Reagan. At this crossroads in the American narrative, this crucial moment of decision, it behooves us to look at contemporary issues in a very broad historical context — that is, a providential context, past, present and future. The theme of the ever progressing nature of God’s providence is expressed in Ecclesiastes 3:1-8 (KJV):
To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven…
A time to kill, and a time to heal; a time to break down, and a time to build up;…
A time to rend, and a time to sew; a time to keep silence, and a time to speak;
A time to love, and a time to hate; a time of war, and a time of peace.
The political pendulum swings back and forth.
Government grew, during the Great Depression and World War II, for example. And it receded, during the 1990s under the Republican Congress. Often, the economy grew together with government expansion. Automobile and airplane manufacturers exploded in the aftermath of the military buildup of the Second World War.
Although government grew after the Depression and during the war, so did private industry.